TECHNICAL 
 LEEP Mats are generally constructed of Douglas  
 Fir Grade 1 lumber. Mats are put through a rigorous   
 inspection process prior to being assigned a grade  
 and becoming available for use. 
 Call for Rental Info 
 LEADING EDGE 
   EQUIPMENT PARTNERS 
 (206) 999-1503 
 USED MATS 
 • Condition: Very Good 
 • General Use: – Crane Mats 
       – Digging Mats 
       – Outrigger Pads 
 • Condition: Good 
 • General Use: – Crane Mats    
             – Digging Mats 
       – Outrigger Pads 
 • Condition: Fair   
 • General Use: – Access Mats   
       – Digging Mats 
 AGRADE 
 BGRADE 
 CGRADE 
 3. What is nominal  
 driving resistance? 
 When piles are driven into the ground, the  
 load that is applied consists of two types of  
 loads: (1) dynamic load, and (2) static load.  
 Dynamic load results from the propagation  
 of stress waves along the body of the pile  
 and thus the load due to driving becomes  
 greater than the static load – which is  
 mainly the load from the superstructure.  
 Consequently,  the  soil  resistance  that  
 opposes pile movement into the ground  
 during driving is higher than the soil resistance  
 required to support the design loads  
 from  the  superstructure  once  the  structure  
 is built. According to AASHTO 2014,  
 Commentary C10.7.3.7, the mobilized soil  
 resistance during pile driving is called the  
 Nominal  Driving Resistance  (Rndr) which  
 should be greater than or equal to the sum  
 of the factored loads divided by the resistance  
 factor jdyn (considering no down drag  
 and no scour forces for simplicity). Thus: 
 Rndr = (ΣgiQi)/jdyn ………… (1) 
 Where, ΣgiQi is the factored load per pile  
 (MFSLSL) 
 According to FHWA 2016 Section 2.10,  
 the  maximum  factored  resistance  for  a  
 given pile type is the lesser of the factored  
 structural resistance and the factored  
 geotechnical resistance for that pile.  
 Geotechnical  resistance  is  the  resistance  
 offered by the soils, PWR and rock whereas  
 structural  resistance is  the  resistance  
 offered by the steel section without any  
 damage to the steel. The MFSLSL must not  
 be greater than the MFSR of piles which  
 is the allowable load the structural steel  
 can  safely  take  without  exceeding  half  
 the yield stress of steel. For example, the  
 MFSR of HP 12x53 for Grade 50 Steel ( fy =  
 50 ksi) would be (15.5 in2 x 50 kips/in2)*0.5  
 =  387.5 kips, where Resistance Factor=0.5  
 and  Steel  Area  of  the  HP12x53  section  
 is 15.5 in2. 
 When a pile is founded in soils, the  
 geotechnical resistance generally becomes  
 less than the structural capacity of the  
 steel and therefore, the maximum factored  
 resistance, i.e., the Nominal Driving  
 Resistance (NDR) is what controls the  
 design. However, when the pile is founded  
 on rock like materials such as PWR or bedrock, 
  the geotechnical capacity generally  
 exceeds the structural capacity and therefore, 
  structural capacity controls the design  
 (AASHTO 2014, Article 10.7.3.2.3). 
 From soil dynamics, it can be explained  
 why the driving resistance in soils is greater  
 than the post-construction static resistance. 
  In rock-type materials that behave  
 like  a  refusal  medium,  driving  of  piles  
 becomes difficult and driving resistance  
 is not practically mobilized. Geotechnical  
 bearing capacity far exceeds the structural  
 capacity of pile materials, which control  
 the design. We believe the condition of  
 fixity of a pile bearing on rock type materials  
 can be considered “free end” conditions  
 where the compressive stress wave  
 reaches the plane of discontinuity (top of  
 refusal strata) with no inertia to overcome  
 and,  thus,  the  energy  cannot  continue  
 to travel downward; however, the energy  
 cannot disappear to zero, so it reflects  
 upward  when, at that  particular  instant,  
 velocity doubles up and force becomes  
 zero (Salgado, 2008). But in soils, there  
 is no change in sudden discontinuity of  
 materials and a downward stress wave has  
 to meet an upward stress wave that would  
 be reflected by the refusal strata encountered  
 below the pile tip level; as a result  
 of collision of these two waves traveling  
 in opposite directions, net velocity at the  
 tip level will be zero but the force associated  
 with this collision will double up.  
 Refer to Figure 2 for a simple illustration  
 of this concept. 
 4. Measurement of pile capacity  
 using Case Method 
 AASHTO  (2014)  emphasizes  that  signal  
 matching method should be used for  
 estimating static pile capacity from measurements  
 of force and velocity. Static pile  
 capacity is computed by first measuring the  
 force and velocity of the stress waves during  
 pile driving,  using  a  PDA. Then,  static  
 capacity is computed using a computer  
 program: CAse Pile Wave Analysis Program  
 (CAPWAP). CAPWAP is based on a numerical  
 technique known as Case Method. Case  
 Figure 2: Illustration of fixed and free end conditions for wave propagation 
 www.piledrivers.org  PILEDRIVER  |  121 
 
				
/www.piledrivers.org